 |
Our Aviary
|
But not really for long. Within a couple of years, we were made aware that
parts of the aviary had been rotting for some time, and which our own rather amateurish efforts had failed to correct. We realised that a much more radical repair was essential. Jack again to the rescue ! The relevant parts of the back of the aviary were rebuilt and we took the opportunity of replacing the breeding cages and the inside lining of the aviary. Jack built for us a set of forty four breeding cages, and having heard many good reports about plastic cage fronts, we placed our order with Kent cages. Once one has overcome to slight disadvantage prompted by them being less rigid than wire fronts, they are a boon - for one thing, they never rust !
The present structure succeeded the birdroom which we had purchased and erected during the biting winter of 1962/63, as described in the About Us page and from the outset was externally of a completely different design. We had been discussing a design for some considerable time and had basically decided on the proportions of our "dream aviary" - the ultimate design - and when we went on to consult our close friend Jack Robertson, those dreams began to take on a mantle of reality.
He told us that he could acquire a set of old garage doors, which had run on a track and which he felt would make
an excellent front to an aviary, once set on a frame.
He went on to suggest a place where we could buy timber from a stock which had been fire-damaged, and the three of us visited the yard and in the course of a few trips we purchased all the timber we required, at between 4d(1.66p) and 6d (2.5p) per foot. Over the next few weeks, Jack built us our aviary, in sections and various friends from Sunderland BS rallied around to erect it on an arranged day. Luckily, the genius of the weather lent his support and the structure was put up in dry weather, which continued until we had finished felting the roof.
The overall dimension of our "little palace" were 21' x 7' x 6' 9"high,approximately, designed to comply with the local government regulations of the time which insisted that such outbuildings be of less than 1,000 cu.feet in size. This was not a problem to us; the new shed was 50% larger than its predecessor and we were sure that it would meet all our future needs. (We did also, of course, have two outside flights, as before.)
Sufficient for our needs? Yes, certainly for the next few years, but when we read in our local paper that the regulations had changed we were ready to take advantage of it. We had noticed that our hens, in particular, did not use the outside flight except in damp or overcast conditions, so resolved to replace one of our outside flights with a flight room which would be an integral part of the aviary. Again, we called in the cavalry, in the name of Jack Robertson who advised us and undertook to do the skilled work involved, as long as we provided the labour, as usual . This time, we decided to set the aviary on a concrete floor, which we tiled, and the wooden (marine plywood) walls and roof were set on top of three courses of brick
The dimension of this room were 8' x 8' x 7' . It provides very generous accommodation for up to eighty birds with our present system of perches but we feel sure that it could comfortably accommodate more, if necessary. The front of the flight room largely comprises two large glazed doors, each of which opens. This means that the birds have almost as much access to the outside world as they would with a standard covered flight.
The reality again more than surpassed the vision, and the enjoyment that the birds derived from the new accommodation made the work worthwhile. Additionally, the overall change in the internal structure changed the atmosphere in the aviary, and this was reflected in certain problems in the breeding season, which immediately followed; this was probably simply because the stud had not had time to properly resettle into their colony-routine. By the next year, normal service was resumed.
And apart from normal maintenance work, with some slight structural repairs, this brings us more or less up to date. Looking back, we could have saved ourselves a lot of work if :-
a) regulations originally would have allowed us to erect a larger structure that that we were first permitted.
b) we had been able to raise the necessary finance to allow us to build a brick, or similar, structure
c) we had plumbed in water and drainage, something we have been promising ourselves for years, so that it is not necessary to carry buckets of water to and from the aviary. Who knows , we may get round to it in 2004, but advancing years have taken their toll on our joints so digging the trench will be a problem.
However, all in all, our buildings have served us well and hopefully will do so for some time to come.
 |
|
  |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|